Flutter vs React Native
- Technology

Flutter vs React Native: Best Framework for Cross-Platform App Development

If you want your mobile application to work on different platforms using a single code base, you can save your time and money by developing a cross-platform app. Moreover, users can realize results extracted from cross-platform apps likewise to that of the native apps.

Flutter and React Native are the two most used and effectively efficient cross-platform app development frameworks in 2020. React Native framework was developed and launched by Facebook, whereas Flutter was developed and launched by Google.

Rising Significance of Cross-Platform Development

With the increasing popularity of mobile applications these days, mobile app development companies focus on creating applications that can remain competitive in different market requirements. Application developers are looking for alternatives to help them develop applications with faster speed and fewer resources.

More importantly, both Apple and Google already provided app developers with native tools to develop applications. iOS app developers use Xcode & Swift, and Android app developers deploy technologies like Android Studio & Kotlin or Java to develop mobile applications.

If we talk about a few years ago, there were not enough and adequately well technologies for cross-platform app development. This restricted the developers’ capabilities and affected the cross-platform development of applications in the wrong way. However, people are continuing to choose cross-platform development over native app development, which has led to a significant transformation in mobile app development with several significant cross-platform development benefits.

  • Faster Development
  • Cost Efficiency
  • Teams with a reduced number of members
  • Simplified testing process

Before we get into the comparison of the two most popular frameworks, we would like to draw your attention to the statistics reported by Statista in 2019 on the cross-platform mobile frameworks used by software developers globally.

Flutter vs React Native

Image Source

In this blog, we are heading to compare the best cross-platform development tools based on the programming language to create applications for the iOS and Android platforms.

Flutter vs React Native: Language

A. React Native — JavaScript

React framework uses JavaScript to develop cross-platform applications. JavaScript is an exceptionally well-known language in the web network right now and is generally utilized with React and other famous JavaScript structures. On account of React Native, web designers can manufacture versatile applications with a smidgen of preparing. Because of this, organizations received React Native as an easy decision. React language is JavaScript, a powerfully composed language, and anything should be possible with JavaScript, which is acceptable and terrible simultaneously.

B. Flutter — Dart

Dart is Flutter’s programming language presented by Google in 2011 and is seldom utilized by designers. Dart language structure is straightforward for JavaScript or Java app developers as it bolsters the majority of the object-oriented concepts. It’s anything but difficult to begin with, Dart, as it is extraordinary and simple-to-follow documentation accessible on Flutter developers’ official Dart site.

Analysis & Result

As most web engineers broadly utilize JavaScript, it’s anything but difficult to receive the React Native system. Dart acts as a Flutter language and has an impressive list of capabilities; however, it’s infrequently utilized and less known in the engineering network.

Flutter vs React Native: Specialized Technical Architecture

While picking a cross-platform mobile application development system, it’s fundamental to think about its specialized design. By knowing the system’s internals, we can settle on an educated choice and pick the better for our task.

A. React Native — Flux

React Native framework mainly depends upon the JS runtime environment & its architecture, also recognized as JavaScript bridge. The JavaScript code is accumulated into native code at runtime. React Native uses Flux architecture provided by Facebook. There are many information sources on the core structure of React Native, like this blog. To put it plainly, React Native uses the JavaScript bridge to interact with the native modules.

B. Flutter — Skia

Flutter framework utilizes the Dart system, which has the vast majority of the parts inbuilt, so it’s greater in size and frequently doesn’t require the bridge to interact with the native modules. Dart has such vast numbers of structures, similar to Material Design and Cupertino, stuffed inside, giving all the necessary innovations expected to create mobile applications. The Dart framework utilizes the Skia C++ framework, which has all the conventions, arrangements, and channels. The design of the Flutter framework is clarified in detail in Github Wiki here. To put it plainly, Flutter has everything required for application development in the Flutter framework itself.

Analysis & Result

Flutter framework has the vast majority of the native parts in the structure itself, and it doesn’t generally require a scaffold to speak with the native segments. React Native, in any case, utilizes the JavaScript extension to speak with native modules, which brings about horrible showing.

Flutter vs React Native: Installation

The installation method ought to be direct without having too many complicated steps to be handily learned by developers simply beginning with it.

A. React Native — NPM

The React Native framework can be introduced utilizing the Node Package Manager (NPM). For designers that have a JavaScript foundation, installation of React Native is simple, though different developers would need to gain proficiency with the hub bundle supervisor. The hub bundle director can introduce the bundles locally or all around. The developers should comprehend where precisely the double is found. While installing React Native on macOS, we have to have the HomeBrew bundle director too.

B. Flutter — Binary Download from Source

Flutter can be introduced by downloading the pair for a particular stage from Github. We need to download the flutter.zip file and include it as a PATH variable on account of macOS. Ripple ought to improve the installation method by supporting package managers like Homebrew, MacPorts, YUM, APT, and so forth with the goal that clients wouldn’t have to play out these additional means during installation.

Analysis & Result

Both Flutter and React Native frameworks require one-liner installation with native package managers for a particular OS. Yet, Flutter installation appears to require additional means for adding the double to PATH and downloading it from the source code, which may be valuable for the non-JavaScript developers. React Native can be introduced by simply utilizing package managers and without the issue of downloading the twofold from the source.

Flutter vs React Native: Set-up and Project Configuration

The way toward setting up the developer machine to utilize the new structure requires some serious energy. It requires loads of configuration of software installations. The technology ought to have proper documentation to get clients ready for action.

A. React Native

The beginning aide of the React Native Android studio projects accepts that the developer has all the necessary set-up for creating for iOS and Android. There is little information on the Xcode command line tools; however, it won’t be sufficient to get moving. The documentation tends to the progression of beginning another project. There is no setup guide available for managing Android projects in the React Native report.

B. Flutter

The beginning aide for Flutter Android studio has precise data on IDE set-up and platform set-up for the iOS and Android platforms. You can peruse all the necessary set-up subtleties on Flutter introduced for macOS here. On this, Flutter has a CLI tool named Flutter Doctor, which can direct developers through the set-up. It assesses which tools are introduced on the nearby machine and which devices should be arranged. When the Flutter specialist order is upbeat, we can continue with making another Flutter application. There is a different page on the best way to arrange the editors to start Flutter.

Analysis & Result

Considering this comparison between the two frameworks, we can conclude that Flutter offers better documentation and CLI support for set-up and configuration.

Flutter vs React Native: Development APIs & User Interface

When creating cross-platform mobile applications, support for the local part is critical. Without the help of the local part, our application won’t feel like a local application. Significantly, the structure has an API to get to the local modules with no agony.

A. React Native — Less Components

The center React Native UI components provide rendering and gadgets to get to APIs. To get to a large portion of the local modules, React Native hosts to depend on third-party libraries. React Native is a lot reliant on third-party libraries.

B. Flutter — Rich in Components

Flutter structure is packaged with UI rendering segments, gadget API get to, route, testing, stateful administration, and libraries’ heaps. This rich set of segments expels the need to utilize third-party libraries. If you get the Flutter system, it implies you will have everything required for creating mobile applications. Flutter also has gadgets for Material Design and Cupertino that help developers render the UI on the iOS and Android platforms handily.

Analysis & Result

Flutter is a rich-featured framework used to develop APIs, and UI segments are the main reasons why Flutter is better than React Native. React Native is more of participating in third-party libraries.

CONCLUSION

We discussed the quality framework based on several parameters any mobile app development company may consider before choosing the technology to develop a cross-platform application. As per our studies, we found that Flutter has fewer users than React Native, but it does not make it any weaker competitor to React Native anyway. Even, Flutter was proven better than React Native in many ways and has been considered the future of cross-platform app development by the experts in the industry.

There are many other parameters an organization may look for, like budget savings, reduced time-to-market, and other conveniences. Both frameworks do an excellent job of offering an efficient and effective approach to developing mobile applications. Also, we would like to say that cross-platform development might be the requirement of many modern-age businesses. However, native apps can still be considered faster, more responsive, and indulging in rich user experience. So, you should jump in this bandwagon of cross-platform app development with one of the best organizations.

Frequently Asked Questions

When it comes to performance, Flutter takes the crown as it is much faster than React Native. However, you can easily share code when using React Native, whether you're developing for an iOS or Android platform as well as use the vast libraries that can help you run animations at 60 frames per second.

Flutter ranks higher with 75.4% and React Native also cut with 62.5% among most loved frameworks. Something to keep in mind here is that React Native has been around longer years now and several people are already working on it. Whereas, Flutter is only a year old and is starting to get more popular.

According to Google trends, on an average 61% of developers are interested in Flutter whereas 81% of developers still preferred React Native for the app development. When it comes to cross-platform app development technology trends, both the frameworks are pretty much similar in terms of popularity.

1 thought on “Flutter vs React Native: Best Framework for Cross-Platform App Development

  1. We have been working with Flutter for about 2 years now. Getting better and better with each version released. Such a time saver having a single codebase to manage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *